Bible & Christianity › Revivals & missions › The Enlightenment: reason questions faith
Modern biblical criticism
from the 1700s; Wellhausen's hypothesis 1878· Teaching or doctrine· Books & writings
Historical recordConfirmed by archaeology, outside sources or contemporary records.
The study of the Bible with historical and literary methods, asking who wrote each text, when, from what sources, and why.
See it on the Bible & Christianity map →What it is
In the 1600s Spinoza and the French priest Richard Simon questioned whether Moses wrote the whole Torah. In 1753 the physician Jean Astruc noticed that Genesis uses two names for God, hinting at separate sources. German scholars applied the methods to the Gospels and the search for the 'historical Jesus'. In 1878 Julius Wellhausen set out the influential Documentary Hypothesis. Catholics officially embraced careful critical study in 1943 (Pius XII); many conservative Protestants use its tools but reject some conclusions.
Why it matters
It underlies nearly all university Bible scholarship, including much of the dating on this map, and pushed churches to rethink what 'inspired Scripture' means.
Sources and history
Its evidence is the texts themselves: repeated stories, shifts in style and vocabulary, manuscript variants, and comparison with ancient Near Eastern writings and the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Questions and debates
Scholars disagree widely on methods and results, from dating the Torah to how much of the Gospels reflects Jesus's own words; critics say it often overstates its certainty.
Inside this (1)
Connections (4)
▸The Enlightenment: reason questions faith fostered Modern biblical criticismHistorical record
The connection
The Enlightenment insisted that every text, the Bible included, be examined by reason like any other ancient book. Spinoza (1670) argued Moses could not have written the whole Torah; the Reimarus fragments, published by Lessing in 1774–1778, separated the 'historical Jesus' from church teaching. German universities turned these questions into a scholarly discipline.
When and where
Holland, France and Germany, about 1670–1800; university faculties at Göttingen, Halle and Tübingen took the lead in the 1800s.
Historical evidence
Spinoza's Theological-Political Treatise, Richard Simon's Critical History (1678) and the Reimarus fragments survive and are cited by later critics as starting points.
Questions and debates
Some historians stress Christian roots instead, such as the Reformation's focus on original languages and the Catholic priest Simon, over Enlightenment skepticism.
▸Modern biblical criticism proposed multiple sources for The Torah (Pentateuch, five books of Moses)Mostly agreed by scholars
The connection
Critics noticed that the Torah tells some stories twice (two creation accounts, Genesis 1 and 2), uses different names for God, and shifts in style. Wellhausen's Documentary Hypothesis (1878) proposed four sources, J, E, D and P, written between about the 10th and 5th centuries BC and combined after the Babylonian exile.
When and where
France and Germany: Jean Astruc on Genesis (1753), W. M. L. de Wette on Deuteronomy (1805), and Julius Wellhausen, building on Karl Graf (1878).
How do we know?
The evidence is internal: doublets, vocabulary and theology. Deuteronomy's link to the 'book of the law' found under King Josiah (2 Kings 22, about 622 BC) is widely accepted.
Questions and debates
Many scholars now doubt a separate E source and prefer layered models; traditional Jews and Christians affirm Mosaic authorship. Multiple authorship is broadly agreed; the details are not.
▸Fundamentalism and the Scopes trial rejected Modern biblical criticismHistorical record
The connection
Fundamentalists rejected the 'higher criticism' that read the Bible like any ancient text, splitting the books of Moses into later sources and doubting miracles. The Fundamentals included essays attacking it and insisted the Bible was without error. The fight split Presbyterians and Baptists in the 1920s, as in Harry Emerson Fosdick's 1922 sermon 'Shall the Fundamentalists Win?'
When and where
Princeton Seminary's defense of inerrancy (1881); The Fundamentals, 1910–15; Northern Presbyterian and Baptist battles of the 1920s; J. Gresham Machen's founding of Westminster Seminary, 1929.
Historical evidence
The essays themselves, heresy trials such as Charles Briggs's (1893), and the sermons and pamphlets of both sides.
Questions and debates
Some fundamentalists, like Machen, were serious scholars who rejected critics' naturalistic assumptions, not scholarship itself. How to define inerrancy is still debated (Chicago Statement, 1978).
▸Mesopotamian flood stories (Atrahasis, Gilgamesh) gave new evidence in 1872 to Modern biblical criticismHistorical record
The connection
When George Smith revealed in 1872 that a Mesopotamian tablet told a Noah-like story, from a tradition older than Genesis, it shook Victorian views of the Bible as unique. It strengthened scholars who studied the Bible as a human, historical text shaped by its neighbors.
When and where
London, 3 December 1872, at the Society of Biblical Archaeology, with Prime Minister Gladstone attending. Germany's 'Babel and Bible' debate followed in 1902.
Historical evidence
Smith's published paper, wide press coverage and later scholarship, like Friedrich Delitzsch's 1902 'Babel und Bibel' lectures in Berlin, document the impact.
Questions and debates
Some believers saw the tablets as confirming a real flood, others as undermining Genesis; how much they changed scholarship versus public opinion is debated.