Rabbit Hole MapsAbout

Technology & Medicine › Printing & the scientific revolution › Scientific Revolution

Newton's Principia

1687· Book, artwork, monument or document· Tools, energy & materials

Well documentedSolid records, physical evidence or scientific consensus.

Isaac Newton's 1687 book setting out three laws of motion and universal gravitation, uniting heaven and Earth under one physics.

See it on the Technology & Medicine map →

How it works

Its Latin title means 'Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy.' Prompted by Edmond Halley, who also paid to print it, Newton showed that the force making an apple fall also holds the Moon in orbit, weakening with the square of distance. From three laws of motion and this one law he derived the planets' elliptical orbits, the tides, comet paths and Earth's slight flattening. He wrote mostly in classical geometry, though he had also developed calculus.

Why it mattered

It showed that a few mathematical laws could predict nature precisely. Engineers still use it for bridges, machines and spaceflight; Einstein refined it only for extreme speeds and gravity.

How we know

The printed book and Newton's manuscripts at Cambridge; successful predictions such as the 1758 return of Halley's Comet, Earth's polar flattening measured in the 1730s, and Neptune's discovery in 1846.

Still unknown or debated

Robert Hooke claimed he suggested the inverse-square law first. The falling-apple story comes from Newton himself, told late in life, and may be embellished.

Connections (3)

▸Mechanical clock lent its clockwork image to Newton's PrincipiaMostly agreed

The connection

Clocks gave early modern thinkers a model of nature as a machine running by fixed rules; Kepler, Descartes and Boyle compared the universe to a clock. Newton's Principia (1687) gave that picture precise laws of motion and gravity, and pendulum clocks supplied the accurate timing physics needed. Newton himself, though, thought God occasionally adjusted the system.

When and how

Europe in the 1600s: Kepler in Prague, Boyle in England, Newton in Cambridge; Huygens's pendulum clock (1656) in the Netherlands.

How sure are we?

Kepler's 1605 letter likens the heavens to clockwork; the Principia uses Richer's 1672 pendulum-clock timings from Cayenne as evidence that Earth bulges at the equator.

Debates and open questions

Whether the clock metaphor shaped science or merely decorated it is debated; the fully self-running 'clockwork universe' belongs more to Laplace, around 1800.

▸Galileo Galilei laid the groundwork for Newton's PrincipiaWell documented

The connection

Galileo showed that falling bodies speed up uniformly and that a moving object keeps moving unless something stops it. Newton built these into his first and second laws, then joined them with Kepler's planetary laws to show that one gravity governs falling apples and orbiting moons.

When and how

Galileo's Two New Sciences (Leiden, 1638); Newton, born within a year of Galileo's death, published Principia in London in 1687.

How we know

Newton's Principia explicitly credits Galileo with discovering the first two laws and the parabolic path of projectiles.

Debates and open questions

Galileo's idea of inertia was incomplete, and historians debate how much Newton owed Galileo versus Descartes, who stated straight-line inertia more clearly.

▸Newton's Principia supplied the orbital mechanics for the Apollo 11 Moon landingWell documented

The connection

Newton's laws of motion and gravity, published in 1687, are what NASA used to plan Apollo's path: the burn to leave Earth orbit, the coast to the Moon, entry into lunar orbit and the return. Einstein's corrections were too small to matter. Newton himself imagined a cannonball fired fast enough to circle the Earth.

When and how

Principia: London, 1687. Apollo trajectories: computed in the 1960s by NASA and MIT engineers and mathematicians, including NASA's Katherine Johnson.

How we know

Apollo's navigation documents and its guidance software, now public, are built on Newtonian equations of motion and gravity.

Debates and open questions

Not disputed. Newton's physics still needed two centuries of refinement by Euler, Lagrange, Gauss and others, plus computers, before it could steer a spacecraft.