World Religions › Modern › Secularization
Darwin's On the Origin of Species
November 24, 1859· Scripture or text· New movements & secular thought
Historical recordConfirmed by archaeology, outside sources or contemporary records.
Charles Darwin's 1859 book arguing that species evolve over vast time through natural selection rather than separate creation.
See it on the World Religions map →What it is
After a five-year voyage on HMS Beagle (1831–36) and two decades of research, Darwin published On the Origin of Species in London on November 24, 1859; booksellers took the whole first printing of about 1,250 copies at once. He argued that living things vary, more are born than survive, and those best suited to their surroundings pass on their traits. The Descent of Man (1871) applied the theory to humans.
Why it matters
It gave a natural explanation for life's apparent design, challenged literal readings of Genesis, and forced every faith to work out how scripture relates to science.
Sources and history
Darwin's notebooks, letters and editions survive; since then fossils, genetics and DNA sequencing have confirmed evolution as the foundation of modern biology.
Questions and debates
The famous 1860 Oxford exchange between Thomas Huxley and Bishop Wilberforce survives only in later recollections, so what was actually said is uncertain.
Connections (3)
▸Darwin's On the Origin of Species accelerated SecularizationMostly agreed by scholars
The connection
Natural selection explained life's apparent design without a designer, undercutting a leading argument for God, William Paley's 'watchmaker'. Many educated Victorians, Darwin among them, moved toward doubt, and science gained authority over questions of origins once answered by scripture. Many believers, though, accepted evolution as God's way of creating.
When and where
Britain and beyond from 1859; Thomas Huxley coined 'agnostic' in 1869, and Darwin described himself that way in an 1879 letter.
How do we know?
Victorian letters, memoirs and sermons record losses of faith after Darwin; later surveys link rejection of evolution with stronger religiosity, though not uniformly.
Questions and debates
Historians reject a simple 'war of science and religion': many clergy embraced evolution, and doubt had other causes too, such as biblical criticism.
▸Darwin's On the Origin of Species challenged literal readings of The Torah (Five Books of Moses)Historical record
The connection
Genesis, the Torah's first book, describes God creating the world in six days and humans as a special creation. Darwin's theory implied a far older Earth and humans descended from earlier species. Jews and Christians responded differently: reading Genesis as allegory, seeing evolution as God's method, or rejecting evolution as contrary to scripture.
When and where
Britain and America from 1859; responses ranged from rabbis and clergy embracing evolution to the 1925 Scopes trial in Tennessee and later creationist movements.
Historical evidence
Sermons, rabbinic writings, church statements and court records document the debate; Gallup polls still track Americans' views on human origins.
Questions and debates
How literally Genesis was ever meant is debated: early interpreters such as Philo and Augustine already read parts of it allegorically.
▸Christian fundamentalism rejected Darwin's On the Origin of SpeciesHistorical record
The connection
Some early 'Fundamentals' authors accepted an old earth, but by the 1920s fundamentalists led campaigns to ban teaching human evolution. Tennessee's 1925 law produced the Scopes trial, where William Jennings Bryan defended the Bible against Clarence Darrow. Later came young-earth creationism and intelligent design, both rejected by US courts as science teaching.
When and where
Dayton, Tennessee, July 1925; John Scopes, Bryan and Darrow; Whitcomb and Morris's 'The Genesis Flood' (1961).
Historical evidence
Trial transcripts, state laws, Supreme Court rulings of 1968 and 1987, and Gallup polls tracking creationist belief.
Questions and debates
Historians note the popular image from 'Inherit the Wind' distorts the trial; why nearly 4 in 10 Americans still hold creationist views is studied.