World Religions › Modern › Secularization
Historical-critical Bible scholarship
Strauss 1835; Wellhausen 1878· Belief or practice· New movements & secular thought
Historical recordConfirmed by archaeology, outside sources or contemporary records.
The scholarly study of the Bible as a collection of human documents, asking who wrote each part, when and why.
See it on the World Religions map →What it is
Scholars apply the tools used for any ancient text: comparing manuscripts, styles and historical settings. David Friedrich Strauss's Life of Jesus (1835) treated the Gospel miracles as myth and caused a scandal. Julius Wellhausen (1878) argued that the Torah combines four sources, labeled J, E, D and P, written centuries after Moses. Others compared the Gospels and concluded Mark came first. The Catholic Church resisted at first, but Pope Pius XII endorsed critical methods in 1943.
Why it matters
It changed how many Jews and Christians read scripture, split churches into liberal and conservative camps, and helped provoke fundamentalism as a reaction.
Sources and history
The scholarship itself, from Spinoza and Strauss to Wellhausen, plus manuscript finds such as the Dead Sea Scrolls (1947) that let scholars test their theories.
Questions and debates
Wellhausen's four-source model has been heavily revised; scholars still disagree about when and how the Torah was compiled.
Connections (4)
▸The Enlightenment and religion laid groundwork for Historical-critical Bible scholarshipMostly agreed by scholars
The connection
Enlightenment thinkers began reading the Bible like any other book. Spinoza's Theological-Political Treatise (1670) doubted that Moses wrote the Torah; the French priest Richard Simon (1678) studied its sources; Hermann Reimarus privately questioned the Gospels, and Lessing published his fragments in 1774–78. Their methods became the basis of 19th-century Bible scholarship.
When and where
The Dutch Republic, France and Germany, 1670–1780: Spinoza in Amsterdam, Simon in Paris, Reimarus in Hamburg and Lessing in Wolfenbüttel.
How do we know?
The texts survive, and later critics, including Strauss, cite them directly; Spinoza's book was banned, showing how radical it seemed.
Questions and debates
Some scholars stress older roots, such as the medieval Jewish commentator Ibn Ezra's hints about Moses' authorship, which Spinoza himself cited.
▸Historical-critical Bible scholarship fueled SecularizationMostly agreed by scholars
The connection
If the Bible was written by many human authors over centuries, with contradictions, its authority as God's word came into question for many readers. Strauss's Life of Jesus, translated by George Eliot in 1846, became a byword for faith-shaking scholarship. Liberal churches adapted, but critical scholarship helped many educated Europeans drift from traditional belief.
When and where
German universities from the 1830s, spreading to Britain through translations and the controversial Essays and Reviews (1860), and to America by the 1880s.
How do we know?
Victorian memoirs often cite biblical criticism as a cause of lost faith; heresy trials, such as Charles Briggs's in the 1890s, show churches' alarm.
Questions and debates
Its effect is hard to separate from science, urbanization and politics; many leading critics remained devout believers who saw their work as serving faith.
▸Historical-critical Bible scholarship questioned Moses' authorship of The Torah (Five Books of Moses)Historical record
The connection
Tradition holds that Moses wrote the Torah as God revealed it. Critics noticed doublets such as two creation stories, different names for God, and Moses' own death recorded in Deuteronomy. Wellhausen's documentary hypothesis (1878) proposed four sources, J, E, D and P, woven together by about the 500s–400s BC.
When and where
German universities in the 1800s, from Wilhelm de Wette's work on Deuteronomy (1805) to Julius Wellhausen's Prolegomena (1878).
Historical evidence
The textual patterns are visible to any careful reader; the explanation is debated. Orthodox Jews and many Christians hold Mosaic authorship as a matter of faith.
Questions and debates
Many scholars now prefer models of fragments or later supplements over Wellhausen's four documents; the dating of the sources, especially J and E, is contested.
▸Christian fundamentalism pushed back against Historical-critical Bible scholarshipHistorical record
The connection
German critical scholarship, which treated the Bible as a human historical document with multiple sources, reached American seminaries by the 1890s. Fundamentalists answered with inerrancy, the doctrine that the Bible is without error in its original manuscripts, and with essays in The Fundamentals defending traditional authorship and miracles.
When and where
Princeton Seminary, 1881 inerrancy essay by Hodge and Warfield; Presbyterians suspended Charles Briggs for heresy, 1893; Machen's 'Christianity and Liberalism' (1923).
Historical evidence
The Fundamentals' own essays, heresy-trial records, and later statements such as the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978).
Questions and debates
Whether inerrancy is historic Christian teaching or largely a 19th-century response to criticism is debated by historians and theologians.