Philosophy › Reason, experience & Enlightenment › The Enlightenment
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
1759–1797· Philosopher· Politics, society & justice
Well documentedSolid records, texts or physical evidence.
English writer whose 1792 A Vindication of the Rights of Woman argued that women are equally rational and deserve equal education.
See it on the Philosophy map →The idea
The idea: women seem frivolous not by nature but because they are trained only to please men. If reason is what gives humans rights and virtue, women must be educated to use it. She attacked Rousseau's plan to raise girls for men's convenience, called for coeducational national schools, and hinted that women should have political representation. She had already answered Burke in 1790. Main objection, from later feminists: she spoke mainly for middle-class women and still saw motherhood as women's central duty.
Why it matters
It is a founding text of feminism, turning Enlightenment arguments about reason and rights against the exclusion of half of humanity.
Legacy and sources
Both Vindications, her letters and novels survive. She died in 1797, eleven days after giving birth to Mary Shelley, later the author of Frankenstein.
Still debated
Why her reputation collapsed for a century: mainly her widower William Godwin's frank 1798 memoir of her love affairs and suicide attempts, or the wider backlash against revolutionary radicals?
Connections (5)
▸Jean-Jacques Rousseau was criticized by Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of WomanWell documented
The connection
In Émile (1762) Rousseau raised the boy for independence but the girl, Sophie, only to please him: women's education 'ought to be relative to men.' Wollstonecraft admired his ideas on freedom but argued this produces weak, cunning dependents; if women can reason, they deserve the same education toward virtue and independence.
When and how
London, 1792, in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, chiefly chapter 5, which quotes Émile at length.
How we know
Her text answers Rousseau by name, page after page; her letters also record her early admiration for him.
Debates and open questions
How much she still shared with Rousseau, including his sentiment and ideal of motherhood; scholars debate whether her feminism grew from him or against him.
▸Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman extended to women the ideals of The EnlightenmentWell documented
The connection
Enlightenment thinkers grounded rights in reason, yet most limited them to men; Talleyrand's 1791 plan for French public education offered girls little. Wollstonecraft took the premise seriously: if reason grounds rights, women have them too. She dedicated Rights of Woman to Talleyrand, urging him to apply revolutionary principles consistently.
When and how
London, 1792, published by Joseph Johnson, whose circle included Thomas Paine and William Godwin; she went to revolutionary Paris that December.
How we know
The book's dedication and argument; similar claims by Condorcet (1790) and Olympe de Gouges (1791) show she was part of a wider debate.
Debates and open questions
How radical she was: she asked mainly for education and only hinted at votes; historians weigh her against Condorcet and de Gouges.
▸Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman prefigured Simone de Beauvoir, The Second SexMostly agreed
The connection
Wollstonecraft argued in 1792 that women seem inferior only because they are denied education and raised as ornaments. De Beauvoir pushed the insight much further: femininity itself is made by society, not nature. Both treated women's supposed 'nature' as a product of upbringing. The link is precedent more than direct borrowing.
When and how
Wollstonecraft wrote in London in 1792, during the French Revolution; de Beauvoir wrote The Second Sex in Paris in 1946–49, some 157 years later.
How sure are we?
Historians of feminism draw the parallel; de Beauvoir's own main sources were Hegel, Marx and existentialism, so direct influence was limited.
Debates and open questions
How new de Beauvoir's view was is debated: Wollstonecraft still saw motherhood as women's natural role, while de Beauvoir questioned any fixed 'feminine' nature.
▸Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman anticipated the feminism of John Stuart MillMostly agreed
The connection
Like Wollstonecraft, Mill argued in The Subjection of Women (1869) that women's supposed nature is 'an eminently artificial thing,' produced by education and law, and that their legal subordination is unjust. Mill went further, demanding equal votes, property rights and careers. The arguments run parallel, but direct borrowing is not documented.
When and how
London; Mill wrote the essay around 1860–61 and published it in 1869, drawing on Harriet Taylor's 1851 essay 'Enfranchisement of Women.'
How sure are we?
The parallel arguments are clear, but Mill never cites her; her reputation was then scandalous, so the influence is likely but indirect.
Debates and open questions
Whether Mill read her at all, and how much credit for his feminism belongs to Harriet Taylor and her daughter Helen Taylor.
▸Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France was answered within weeks by Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of WomanWell documented
The connection
Burke's Reflections appeared on 1 November 1790. Within four weeks Wollstonecraft published A Vindication of the Rights of Men, the first major reply, two years before her book on women. She attacked his defense of inherited privilege and his tears for Marie Antoinette while ignoring the poor; the same rights argument later grounded her feminism.
When and how
London, 29 November 1790, published anonymously by Joseph Johnson; a signed second edition in December made her name.
How we know
Both texts and their dates; her reply quotes Reflections throughout, and Thomas Paine's Rights of Man followed in March 1791.
Debates and open questions
Whether haste weakened it; Johnson reportedly printed sheets as she wrote. How directly it led to Rights of Woman is also discussed.