Philosophy › Renaissance & the new science › Renaissance humanism
Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince
1469–1527· Philosopher· Politics, society & justice
Well documentedSolid records, texts or physical evidence.
Florentine diplomat whose The Prince (written 1513) analyzed how rulers actually gain and keep power, rather than how they should behave.
See it on the Philosophy map →The idea
The idea: politics has its own logic; a ruler who is always good will be ruined among so many who are not, so he must 'learn to be able not to be good'. Machiavelli served Florence's republic as a diplomat for 14 years. When the Medici returned in 1512 he was dismissed, jailed and tortured, then wrote The Prince on his farm. He praised Cesare Borgia's ruthless efficiency. It appeared in 1532, after his death. The main objection: it seems to excuse cruelty and deceit.
Why it matters
He separated political analysis from moral and religious ideals, founding modern political realism; his longer Discourses on Livy also make him a key theorist of republics.
Legacy and sources
The Prince, the Discourses and his 1513 letter to Francesco Vettori describing its writing survive; Florentine archives record his diplomatic career and arrest.
Still debated
Was The Prince sincere advice, a job application to the Medici, or, as Rousseau suspected, a covert warning to republicans? Readers still disagree.
Connections (3)
▸Renaissance humanism shaped Niccolò Machiavelli, The PrinceMostly agreed
The connection
Machiavelli had a humanist education in Latin classics and wrote in the humanist genre of advice to princes, drawing constantly on Roman history, especially Livy. But he turned the genre upside down: earlier humanist handbooks urged princes to be virtuous, while he urged them to be effective.
When and how
Florence, 1480s–1520s; his father Bernardo earned a printed Livy by compiling its index, and the 17-year-old Niccolò collected the bound copy in 1486.
How sure are we?
The Prince and the Discourses on Livy cite Roman authors throughout; his father's diary records the family's Livy; historians like Quentin Skinner place him in humanist traditions.
Debates and open questions
Scholars debate whether he was a humanist working within the tradition or a radical who broke from it entirely.
▸Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince influenced Thomas Hobbes, LeviathanMostly agreed
The connection
Machiavelli described politics as it is, not as it should be, treating power and security as a ruler's real concerns. Hobbes shared that hard-headed realism, starting from fear and self-interest rather than virtue or divine order, but turned it into a systematic theory of why subjects should obey.
When and how
The Prince, written in Florence in 1513 and published in 1532; Leviathan, London, 1651.
How sure are we?
Historians place them in one realist tradition, but Hobbes rarely cites Machiavelli, so direct influence is inferred rather than documented.
Debates and open questions
How much Hobbes drew on Machiavelli is debated; some see Thucydides, whom Hobbes translated in 1629, as the bigger influence.
▸Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince broke with the idealism of Plato's RepublicWell documented
The connection
Plato designed an ideal city ruled by philosophers who know the Good. Machiavelli rejected that approach outright: in chapter 15 of The Prince he dismissed 'republics and principalities that have never been seen', choosing instead 'the effectual truth of the matter'. Politics, he argued, must start from how people actually behave.
When and how
Florence, 1513, written on his farm near San Casciano; Marsilio Ficino's complete Latin translation of Plato had been printed in Florence in 1484.
How we know
The famous rejection is in chapter 15; Machiavelli does not name Plato, but scholars widely read it as aimed at Plato and the idealizing tradition he started.
Debates and open questions
Whether the target was Plato specifically, or the Christian and humanist advice books for princes in general, is debated.