Geopolitics › Global issues & flashpoints › US–China strategic rivalry
Multipolar world and the rise of middle powers
A view of where the 2020s are heading· Issue or flashpoint
OutlookA view about the future, not a fact.
The view that power is spreading from the US to China and to assertive 'middle powers' such as India, Turkey, Brazil and the Gulf states.
See it on the Geopolitics map →The picture
This is an outlook, not a fact. Its backers point to data: the US produces about a quarter of world GDP at market rates and China about a sixth, while emerging economies supply most global growth. Middle powers such as India, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Brazil, Indonesia and the UAE trade with all sides, buy arms from several, and join groups like BRICS while keeping Western ties. Russia and China have promoted a 'multipolar world' in joint statements since 1997.
Why it matters
If middle powers can play Washington and Beijing against each other, alliances loosen, sanctions leak and outcomes depend on bargaining rather than blocs.
Think of it like
Like a market where two big landlords no longer set every rent: mid-size owners gain leverage by playing them off.
Basis for the outlook
IMF and World Bank GDP shares, UN voting records, SIPRI arms-transfer data, BRICS and G20 declarations, and the 1997 Russia–China declaration on a multipolar world.
What to watch
Debated: some analysts see a new US–China bipolar order, others a leaderless 'G-Zero' world, others true multipolarity. Middle powers' room may shrink if the rivalry hardens.
Connections (2)
▸BRICS and its 2024–25 expansion champions Multipolar world and the rise of middle powersFact
The relationship
BRICS declarations repeatedly call for a more just, democratic and multipolar world order, meaning less US and Western dominance in finance and diplomacy. Members push for IMF voting reform, more trade in local currencies and a bigger Global South role at the UN. The expansion itself is presented as proof that power is spreading.
Since when and why
The language runs from the first 2009 Yekaterinburg statement through the Kazan (2024) and Rio (2025) declarations.
How we know
The texts of BRICS summit declarations; whether the world is truly becoming multipolar is an outlook, not a fact.
What to watch
Debated: whether a 'multipolar' order means fairer global governance, as members say, or cover for Chinese and Russian ambitions, as critics argue.
▸India's multi-alignment strategy is a bet on Multipolar world and the rise of middle powersWidely agreed
The relationship
India's strategy assumes no single power will dominate, so a large, independent state gains by dealing with all of them. It backs a multipolar order through BRICS, the SCO and Global South forums, while resisting a China-centered Asia through the Quad.
Since when and why
Developed under Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, whose 2020 book 'The India Way' lays it out.
How solid?
Indian official doctrine and speeches, UN voting patterns, and its simultaneous membership in rival groupings.
What to watch
Outlook: if the world splits into two blocs instead of many poles, India's bet could force harder choices.