Bible & Christianity › Exile & the Second Temple › The Second Temple
Rome conquers Judea
63 BC (Pompey)· Event· Church, doctrine & the world
Historical recordConfirmed by archaeology, outside sources or contemporary records.
The Roman general Pompey took Jerusalem in 63 BC, ending Hasmonean independence and bringing Judea under Roman control.
See it on the Bible & Christianity map →What it is
Two Hasmonean brothers, Hyrcanus II and Aristobulus II, were fighting over the throne, and both appealed to Pompey. He besieged the Temple Mount for three months, took it in 63 BC, and walked into the Holy of Holies, shocking Jews. Rome first ruled through client kings such as Herod, then from AD 6 directly through prefects such as Pontius Pilate. Taxes, troops and insults to the Temple fed unrest that ended in the great revolt of AD 66–70.
Why it matters
Roman rule is the world of the New Testament: the census, the tax collectors, crucifixion and Pilate all come from it, and Roman roads later carried the gospel.
Sources and history
Josephus (Antiquities 14) and Roman writers such as Cassius Dio and Tacitus. The Psalms of Solomon, a Jewish text, appear to lament Pompey's conquest.
Questions and debates
How heavily Roman and Herodian taxes weighed on Galilean villagers, and how far that drove unrest and new religious movements, is debated.
Connections (3)
▸Maccabean revolt and Hanukkah won independence lost in Rome conquers JudeaHistorical record
The connection
The Maccabees' heirs, the Hasmoneans, ruled as priest-kings and had even made a treaty with Rome (1 Maccabees 8). In the 60s BC the brothers Hyrcanus II and Aristobulus II fought over the throne, and both appealed to the Roman general Pompey, then in Syria. Pompey took Jerusalem in 63 BC.
When and where
Jerusalem, 63 BC; Pompey besieged the Temple Mount for three months.
Historical evidence
Josephus (Antiquities 14) gives a detailed account, and Roman historians, including Cassius Dio, confirm Pompey's capture of Jerusalem.
Questions and debates
Historians debate whether Rome, expanding through the East, would have absorbed Judea anyway, or whether the Hasmonean civil war invited it in.
▸Rome conquers Judea installed as king Herod the GreatHistorical record
The connection
When the Parthians invaded Judea in 40 BC, Herod fled to Rome, where Mark Antony and Octavian had the Senate name him King of Judea. With Roman troops he captured Jerusalem in 37 BC, then ruled as a loyal 'client king', keeping order and paying tribute.
When and where
Rome, 40 BC; Jerusalem, 37 BC; confirmed by Octavian (later Augustus) after the Battle of Actium in 31 BC.
Historical evidence
Josephus (Antiquities 14–17; Jewish War 1) gives the full account; Roman sources and Herod's coins and inscriptions confirm his status.
Questions and debates
How his Jewish subjects saw him, an Idumean whose family had converted to Judaism, is debated: a legitimate king or a Roman puppet?
▸Rome conquers Judea appointed governors such as Pontius PilateHistorical record
The connection
In AD 6 Rome deposed Herod's son Archelaus and began governing Judea directly through prefects of the equestrian (knightly) class. Pilate, the fifth, arrived in AD 26. Prefects collected taxes, commanded troops and held the power to order executions, which is why Jesus was brought to Pilate.
When and where
Judea, AD 6 onward; Pilate governed from Caesarea Maritima, AD 26–36, under Emperor Tiberius.
Historical evidence
The Pilate Stone (Caesarea, 1961) gives his title as 'prefect'; Josephus and Philo describe the prefects' powers.
Questions and debates
Whether the Jewish council could execute anyone under Roman rule (John 18:31 says not) is debated, as is the gap between the Gospels' reluctant Pilate and Philo's brutal one.